Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore gay art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 00:46, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Singapore gay art

Relisting for deletion after no consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singapore public gay parties.

Delete as unverifiable biased original research, and indiscriminate. From WP:NOT: "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information: Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics...". Also "Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought: Critical reviews...Opinions on current affairs...". If these artists are notable, they should have their own articles. However, loosely associating them in this fashion is original research and the present article is nothing more than one contributor's review of Singapore gay art. -- Krash (Talk) 15:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, Speedy in fact, no reason for relisting immediately. There was no consensus for deletion. --Vsion 15:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Vsion. --Terence Ong 15:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep for now; then Keep if relisted after a proper month wait. Notable, verifiable, and properly cited. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 19:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Forgive me but the article has no sources. What am I missing? -- Krash (Talk) 19:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Scranchuse 21:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless verified. This is not a speedy keep. Stifle 23:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 00:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Leidiot 02:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I suspect this is accurate, though it needs references and a rewrite to be encyclopedic in sections. AfD is not a subsitute for Cleanup tag or References tag. Georgewilliamherbert 08:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It is not indiscriminate. It is about the history of LGBT art in Singapore, specifically the history of censorship and freedom of expression in Singapore in relation to LGBT art. It is a useful compilation of interesting information that could not readily be found otherwise. No need for a second AFD in two weeks. Wuzzy 15:38, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Wuzzy. Kappa 10:34, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. --Mallarme 11:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Wuzzy. Carlossuarez46 18:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.