Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheila Voser
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sheila Voser
More German hoaxery, see above two listings. NawlinWiki 18:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as attack page. Sheila Voser seems to exist, but the article is at best wrong, at worst libelous. --Huon 18:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- I slapped it with a speedy delete template if that is true (Attack). You may want to make use of {{defwarn}} on the creator if it is that bad. 68.39.174.238 20:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I have removed the attck tag, because I can't see why it is an attack page. Please feel free to put it back, but it would be useful if you could explain why it is an attack. Thanks TigerShark 22:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- You'd have to ask the above commenter; I took it on trust that it was an attackpage and so subject to CSD. 68.39.174.238 01:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- I have removed the attck tag, because I can't see why it is an attack page. Please feel free to put it back, but it would be useful if you could explain why it is an attack. Thanks TigerShark 22:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- I slapped it with a speedy delete template if that is true (Attack). You may want to make use of {{defwarn}} on the creator if it is that bad. 68.39.174.238 20:33, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The fictious German "film titles" given in the article associate her with vaginal candidiasis (Scheidenpilze). I may have overreacted, but I wouldn't like such rumours spread about myself. --Huon 22:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I would tend to agree with Huon. If Sheila Voser actually does exist, this is definately an attack page. Travelbird 23:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. Mr Stephen 21:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Author keeps providing "sources" which turn up nothing on the subject. Given the two hoaxes above with a very similar pattern, I say Delete as very likely hoax Travelbird 23:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete hoax. Wikibout-Talk to me! 16:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Deli nk 19:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Hoax.--213.155.224.232 10:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
