Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shatnermosism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy A7. Royboycrashfan 17:16, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Shatnermosism
I'm speechless...... well-thought-out and entirely bogus. WP:BJAODN a must, but delete it from article space. FreplySpang (talk) 15:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
While perhaps not the most widespread religion, still contains a group of legally ordained Ministers under the Universal Life Church. No reason to delete this article. wentwj Founder of Religion, writer of article Shatnermosism —The preceding kind of unsigned comment was added by Wentwj (talk • contribs) .
- Delete everyone knows that Raptor Jesus was not the real get. Kotepho 16:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
The Raptor Jesus mentioned in the religion is entirely unreleated from the raptor jesus I have just now become aware of. There are no photoshoped pictures, no mocking of the historical jesus. Simply a seperate, Raptor Jesus. --Wentwj 16:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I happen to be a supporter of Shatnermoism and feel that this article should not be persecuted against simply because its a small religion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.233.21.243 (talk • contribs).
- Delete, preposterous. Punkmorten 18:11, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm a legally ordained minister of the ULC as well, but that doesn't mean anything significant. It takes (quite literally) two minutes on their web page to be ordained. Delete a non-religion. Zetawoof(ζ)
- Zetawoof is more charitable than I am. Delete as complete rubbish. Montco 23:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I'm pretty sure this was written by William Shatner. Fishhead64 02:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 04:58, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, Chuck Norris...is inherently inferior to both Shatner and Stamos gives it away as a hoax. Peter Grey 07:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- BJAODN Please, Jack Bauer could kill Chuck Norris just by sheer will. Roodog2k 00:15, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep As a devout Shatnermosist, I find it insulting that simply because my religion's beliefs seem far-fetched to some (no more far-fetched than the beliefs held by Christians, in my opinion) and that our following is small and our organization new, that you denounce my faith as some sort of cheap joke. 68.117.100.37 16:20, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, {{db-club}}, tagged as such and BJAODN. --
Rory096(block) 16:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.