Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexiest and most violent nintendo games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 05:47, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sexiest and most violent nintendo games

Unformated POV listing - not notable nor encyclopedic. Vsmith 03:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC) Delete It's not even wikified.--Atlantima 18:22, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. - Vsmith 03:35, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Either delete it or make it tomorrow's featured article. -Silence 04:36, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete personal POV essay, if that. MCB 05:07, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless this is a verifiable list released by the Queen of England. Qaz ^(talk) 08:40, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong delete I wasn't expecting a great article when I clicked on this, but it's even worse than expected: it isn't even list/bullet formatted and it doesn't even seperate the sexy and violent games! Not to mention that these aren't even games by Nintendo, just games released on Nintendo hardware! There's definitely something encyclopedic to be said about Nintendo's censorship policy, which is covered in its own section of the Nintendo article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:07, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - pointless, impossible to make NPOV CLW 15:53, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per Andrew Lenahan - Starblind... least they could do is format their cruft.--Isotope23 20:17, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Such a trash would dererve to be speedied automatically. Pavel Vozenilek 00:16, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Starblind; usually I would say it couldn't be deleted for being POV, but here the title alone is POV. (The list is also poorly formatted, but that is not a reason for deletion; AfD != cleanup.) --Idont Havaname 02:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This looks like an alphabetical list of the Nintendo 64, Game Boy Advance, and GameCube games with ESRB ratings of "M for Mature". I don't think this is something we need, even under a proper title. --Yggdrasil 04:30, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.