Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serangoon Secondary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep schools for organic growth. Mailer Diablo 16:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Serangoon Secondary School

non notable school ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 17:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• It's been around since 1928? A nicely-developed page. Weak keep. — RJH 19:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep notable as school, looks to be good article Davewild 20:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. Please see Wikipedia:Schools for the ongoing debate about inclusion/deletion of school articles. --Alan Au 20:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all schools. Jcuk 20:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per above. All schools are notable. Chairman S. ^Talk 22:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above Dlyons493 Talk 22:26, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, school with long history. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 00:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Looks alright to me. Scranchuse 02:06, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all schools. Arbusto 07:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, all schools are notable. --Terence Ong 12:47, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep all schools Leidiot 23:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep please stop this we do not erase secondary schools Yuckfoo 03:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Mr. T Ong. Suggest that this nom be closed ASAP. -- JJay 19:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and delist; nominator made an honest (yet correctable) mistake. Silensor 03:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.