Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/See before you die

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ^ask? 22:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] See before you die

Spam. Kafziel 22:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Spam--Nick Y. 23:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - advertisement. - Richardcavell 00:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - information about a website like many other websites and companies that define their core business (Answers.com for example). This can not be considered as advertisement. - yuval 04:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

There are notability standards. Kafziel 04:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - Check the list at Category:Websites, what is the difference between this page and most of the pages under this category? I must agree with Yuval. You can edit it to meet Wiki standards but not to delete it. - Boaz 06:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - I can't edit the article to make your little website more notable. Administrators, please note the contributions of the above editor here, which are only to the article in question and this AfD. Kafziel 13:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - the article is not trying to sell any thing through this, so it's OK with me. If we will AfD all articles about commercial things we will end up to be free encyclopedia that cover very small portion of our world. Just make sure the article is stick to facts and not advertise any service. --128.135.161.69 16:15, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Do you think no one can see your history of contributions (or lack thereof)? Please do not use sockpuppet IP addresses to try to influence the AfD process. Kafziel 16:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:WEB. If kept, de-link the external links. Stifle (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - As I understand your concern about the advertisement and the external links I edited the article. I hope the current version will be good enough to stay - Boaz 23:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Still spam. Not only was it written as an advertisement, it also links to a commercial website. It does not meet any of the criteria specified in the notability guidelines mentioned by Stifle, so there's no need for it to have an article at all. Kafziel 23:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:WEB, Alexa rank is off the scale, looks like vanispamcruftisement. From the site's About page: "We are now in version - Beta 0.4 of this site, covering 58 places in 19 countries". Says it all, really. Just zis Guy you know? 18:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no evidence of meeting WP:WEB. --W.marsh 04:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.