Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second thought

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  16:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Second thought

The anon editor who added this AfD has told me that he/she is unable to complete the process by clicking on the redlink, since this counts as creating a new page, from which anons are barred. So, if possible, I'll take over the reins of this one, and say delete as dictdef per WP:NOT. --BillC 02:05, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, delete it. 71.212.87.103 02:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as dictdef Where ^(talk) 02:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT/WINAD. Royboycrashfan 02:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as dictdef. Bucketsofg 02:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wikitionary. --06:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Dicdef with poorly-written examples. --Icarus 07:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, I agree with Icarus3. JIP | Talk 08:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, dicdef. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Terence Ong 11:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wiktionary ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 15:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki, not delete - Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 16:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki per Kilo-Lima. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 17:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki per above Nick Catalano _contrib ^talk 23:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Either Keep or Transwiki There are 4,800,000 (4.8 million) hits for the exact phrase "Second Thought". --Shultz IV 06:50, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. No wait. On second thought, delete. --Optichan 13:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.