Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Crawford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Angr/talk 13:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scott Crawford

DELETE - nnTheusualsuspect 06:21, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of list of Australia-related deletions. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:29, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable--A Y Arktos 06:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn bio. Harro5 06:36, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Alan Au 06:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Student politician and staffer. His one claim to notability was that he was President of the Melbourne University Student Union when it went bellyup. This is covered in the article. Capitalistroadster 06:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect -- and merge anything useful into Melbourne University Student Union. - Longhair 07:17, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Not notable. Yet. DarrenRay 08:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Ought not Julian Barendse be deleted also? DarrenRay 09:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• There was a VfD vote last June, which resulted in a keep vote. Now the VSU bill has passed, it might be time to review this, but Barendse seems to be far more notable than Crawford. It's not just about what position you hold, it's about what you do in office. Crawford didn't do anything worth noting on Wikipedia; Barendse shaped a major debate. Harro5 09:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• And I certainly don't fault him for doing so but I'm not sure how he's any more notable than Crawford who seemed to get more press. I think they both ought to be deleted until they get into Parliament or something. DarrenRay 15:08, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nn-bio. --Terence Ong 15:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn-bio -- Alpha269 16:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn studentunion-vanity-cruft.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. Garglebutt / (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Ambi 05:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn --kingboyk 02:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. -- Ian ≡ talk 05:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Note: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the Wikipedia:Proposed deletion process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.