Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooby-Doo 3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scooby-Doo 3

All speculation. No official announcement, no IMDb page, no nothing. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. FuriousFreddy 14:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. "There is no real official plot," only rumours of dissociation. :) Dlohcierekim 15:35, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Speculative, even three stars don't want to come back. As per nom and Dlohcierekim as well. --Fbv65edel ^{(discuss | contribs)} 15:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP is not a crystal ball. feydey 17:05, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per feydey. M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 18:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per feydey. Recreate it if nessesary. --Starionwolf 23:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. CB. Send it with Final Destination 4, Ghostbusters 3, Mrs Doubtfire 2, Kung Pow 2 and, for all I know, Ishtar 2. Fan1967 23:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Well, if you told me a month ago there was gonna be a Garfield sequel, I would have laughed at you, but there you go. Anyhoo, not a crystal ball, yada yada, Delete. Danny Lilithborne 01:36, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everyone. Heck, there was supposed to be a sequel to Battlefield Earth! Grandmasterka 02:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 02:32, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom --Angelstorm 01:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.