Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schwarzreich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 00:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Schwarzreich

Originally a {{prod}} candidate. This band seems to fail WP:MUSIC. Claims a discography, but also admits "currently recording its first professional demo." Wikimirrors aside, most search results are about other people with the name. Delete. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:05, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. I think their existing albums are self-made. Most of the google results are either bulletin board fare or brief mentions in articles about their ex-guitarrist's church burning. He might be notable, but the band is not. ×Meegs 10:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 19:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

They meet the following Criterea

Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or the local scene of a city (or both, as in British hip hop); note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.

They are the most prominent Chaos Metal band in Victoria

Has won or placed in a major music competition.

The Push Start Battle of the Bands is the largest Battle of the Bands for Amaetuers in Australia. They came second in their heat

Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that page.)

They have performed on Channel 31, a Public Access Television show —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 140.159.4.4 (talk • contribs).

• Comment; the key point of that last one being "a work of media that is notable," which, by definition, public access shows do not. ergot 00:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

• And Delete. Does not meet WP:MUSIC. ergot 00:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Most prominant Victorian band in a NN genre, appears to have come in second in a Battle of the Bands qualifying round and not moved on, played on public access. Seems to fail WP:MUSIC to me. - Rynne 02:36, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.