Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saxotone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Linuxbeak | Talk 19:03, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Saxotone

non-notable; the technique described is feasible but the article itself seems to have been introduced as a prank (link). Gyrofrog (talk) 05:03, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Comment: I would have instead proposed merging this with Hybrid instrument if such an article (or list) existed. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:07, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. --Dvyost 05:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not sure about feasibility. You need to lower the resonance of the reed--by making it bigger--in order to sound the built-in resonance in a longer-bored instrument. Right? Chick Bowen 23:17, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Agreed with all of the above.Rhetoricalwater 22:07, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.