Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saxon = Joke Account

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. · Katefan0^(scribble) 20:48, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Saxon = Joke Account

Note to closing admin: Please check the history and make sure none of the votes have been tampered with. - Mgm|^(talk) 07:50, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

Nonsense, can someone speedy this? Calls for speedy deletes get removed. NeilN 18:57, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete agree with nominator. -- (☺drini♫|☎) 19:51, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete, but I don't think it's a speedy except perhaps as an attack page? —brighterorange ^(talk) 20:13, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Congratulations, you managed to get a sign on TV (at a wrestling event, where everyone has them, too). Nonsense, and not notable. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. Note that anon editors are editing the page in an attempt to disrupt other Users' computers, and repeatedly vandalizing this page. Zoe 22:29, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as nonsense and vandal magnet (such as 62.254.14.208 (talk • contribs) and 24.3.165.182 (talk • contribs), who blanked this AfD.) -- Antaeus Feldspar 22:24, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

I have protected the page because of repeated vandalism. Zoe 23:30, September 5, 2005 (UTC)

I would love to see this page live on. I know it's kind of stupid, but that's part of todays culture, learning about idiot things other people have done. I beleive it has a place in the Wikipedia

• Please note that Ziddy attempted to change Zoe's comment to a delete vote. - Mgm|^(talk) 07:48, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A note on a wrestling event that sparked an injoke on one messageboard or forum, is not important enough for its own article. - Mgm|^(talk) 07:49, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, messageboard cruft. — JIP | Talk 07:51, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing redeems this article. McPhail 16:28, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Strong delete, speedy is fine, messageboardcruft. --Idont Havaname 23:47, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as patent nonsense---CH (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.