Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save Stargate SG-1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy redirect, see final comment. Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 18:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Save Stargate SG-1

Rejected as a speedy non notable group of people. Non notable campaign and group of people Nuttah68 20:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as {{nocontent}}. It's a one sentence article, followed by 20 external links, which, for me, easily qualifies under CSD A3. -- Kicking222 20:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

  I did consider speedy under A3, but I believe it might be possible for a decent article to be formed either at this location, or merged with another article. So I'm not sure if this counts as a keep !vote or not, but certainly don't speedy. Petros471 20:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

  Why would my "speedy delete" vote count as a "keep" vote? Did my Kerry vote count for Bush? (Well, knowing Bush's seediness, maybe it did.) No, my speedy delete is a speedy delete; if it can't be speedily deleted, it should just be deleted (but I have no idea why, as other people have pointed out, it couldn't be speedied under A7 or A3). -- Kicking222 12:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

  I was referring to my comment being a 'keep' (or otherwise), not yours. Of course you meant you wanted the article deleted. I was disagreeing that it should be speedy deleted. In case the admin closing this decides to vote count I'm recommending do not delete and redirect to Stargate SG-1. Petros471 12:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete per Kicking222. TJ Spyke 21:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Stargate SG-1 whatever is not there already. Irongargoyle 21:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Stargate SG-1. --Metropolitan90 00:51, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - CSD A7. Tagged as such. MER-C 07:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• I've removed the speedy tag, as I don't want to overrule the previous admin, and also the fact that there are other users who don't want it speedied (see above) seems to me to mean it shouldn't be. Certainly it will end up deleted, but if there's anything that should in fact be merged, letting it go through AfD will allow that to happen. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 08:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no content and not notable anyway. Shows get cancelled, guys. Gazpacho 09:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this article is a borderline blog. Basically, the only encyclopedic feature of the article is that it states there is a "movement" to save the series. Little sources that would analyse and quantify the "movement", though, aside of having links to some random forum threads and having a few links to sites that kind of sprung up last week, just to show that this nebulous "movement" does exist. And on top of that, links to articles in chronological format... ouch! This does warrant a mention in Stargate SG-1, but there's little that can be merged from this article. This is a good example of how not to link to external sites... --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• On reconsidering, looking at what's already at the Stargate SG-1 article, and the further votes, I've decided to go ahead and speedy end this. You're right, there's really nothing that needs merging. I'm sure any show has fans trying to stop it from being cancelled, and that's the only fact not already at the target page. There is little enough content to speedy delete, but I'm going to make it a redirect to hopefully avoid recreation, and on the off chance anyone does want the history extant to merge something. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 18:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.