Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sauver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 01:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sauver

Sauver has minuscule notability. A visit to its website shows an amazing 7 forum posts, 7 of them being from the developer. "Sauver" being a common word, using Google to evaluate notability is harder. However Google Groups has 0 hits for "sauveros" (the website being sauveros.com). Google Web has 9 non-omitted results, the first being its website's homepage, the second being Wikipedia and the third being a Wikipedia mirror. Another one is from its website, 2 are 404-s and 2 are typos of "sauverons".

The article was created since over 6 monthes but did not get any significant contribution from anyone other than Sauver's developer since then. It is low quality, with a POV tone. Chealer 05:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete very non-notable liveCD Linux distro. Hence, delete by wikipedia is not a webdirectory. -- Koffieyahoo 06:15, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable software per Chealer. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-07-26 11:32Z
• Delete per above. NawlinWiki 18:42, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Do not Delete it is a very good distro and it is new so i think it takes time to get the notice.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.