Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salophilia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. W.marsh 18:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Salophilia

There are no reliable sources on this, therefore it violates Wikipedia:Verifiablity. Google search shows a small number of hits on this, almost all coming from this article, or from another wikipedia article which mentions this term. The only other mention I could find on this was at http://www.thecrimson.harvard.edu/article.aspx?ref=512878 where the word is used, but not defined or explained. Also note that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so the mere existence of the word is not justification for an article here Xyzzyplugh 13:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to Paraphillia, which has a list of this sort of thing. Mister.Manticore 14:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Er, I mean Paraphilia 24.254.114.31 21:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect--Peta 06:16, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No hits on GBooks or GScholar; that's a bad sign. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 18:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.