Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salad Fingers theories (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete NSLE _(T+C) at 08:39 UTC (2006-03-14)

[edit] Salad Fingers theories

Alright, to put it simply, this page violates no less than three wikipedia policy, WP:NOT, Wikipedia:No original research and NPOV. This page is also Un-encyclopedic as, with no official "interpretation" from the creator, there is no basis other than a few peoples opinons. I would suggest cleanup, but I honestly doubt that cleanup would fix the problems inherent in this page. As nominator I vote Strong Delete -- Dragoonmac - ^{If there was a problem yo I'll solve it} 00:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 00:53, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fetofs ^Hello! 00:57, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I like it when the red links come out. Шизомби 01:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. mikka (t) 01:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Staxringold 02:30, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a separate page and no real need for redirect but recommend author/s merge the best of it into the main article before it gets flushed. Salad Fingers is quality. Deizio 02:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. Moe Aboulkheir 02:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge all non-original research into Salad Fingers (mmm Rusty Spoons) --Midnighttonight 07:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOR, the previous VfD [1] was marred by multiple socks. -- Samir ∙ T C 08:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:39, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Localzuk ^(talk) 15:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It's a fine article. A lot of work went into it. It deserves a place on the web. But not here, it's original research. Sorry guys. Herostratus 23:10, 9 March 2006 (UTC) N.B. For reference I counted the votes on the previous AfD's:
  • Closing August 24 2005 - 2 delete, 1 delete-or-merge, 2 merge, 1 abstain. Deleted.
  • Closing August 31 2005 - 6 keep, 10 delete, 5 merge, 1 keep-or-redirect (??), 1 abstain. No consensus.
  • Closing December 14 2005 - 8 keep, 12 delete, 1 merge. No consensus.
  • This AfD (so far) - 10 delete, 1 merge.
  • Giving a historical total so far (granted that people problably voted more than once, but that probably balances out): 14 keep, 34 delete, 9 merge, 1 delete-or-merge, 1 keep-or-redirect, 2 abstain.
• Delete original research. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-10 04:37Z
• Delete per nom --kingboyk 08:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - This is really overanalysing the saladfingers series of flash movies. It smacks of original research and borders on patent nonsense. Something that I would expect to find on a salad fingers fan forum, bordering on fan fiction. - Hahnchen 01:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nominator of previous AFD which was no consensus. NSLE _(T+C) at 02:45 UTC (2006-03-11)
• Delete Original research. Chairman S. ^Talk 08:38, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.