Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saksoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Saksoft

Vanity article.Advertising and spam. Ageo020 00:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment but if they do have international offices, then they may well be notable. Wikipeia is in need of more Idian entries. Perhaps if people could try quick searches for sources? It's nearly 5am here, so I have to sleep rather than give this a go. LinaMishima 03:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom - no sources except for site itself, very few google hits that arent the site itself plus wiki and answer.com. Pinkstarmaci 04:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - The article itself says the company has only about 300 employees. I have a hard time believing that a company that isn't doing anything particularly innovative, with 300 employees, is notable, wherever it is based. --Brianyoumans 04:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete despite my earlier hope, I could only find one article in 10 pages of google results that was not with respect to the company's floatation. LinaMishima 18:37, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. —Khoikhoi 00:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.