Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahraeean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, default action is keep. Babajobu 12:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sahraeean

As it stands this is a vanity CV. However, it claims he is a notable ecconomist. But I can't verify most of it, other than from his own website, which is certainly vanity. -Doc ^ask? 21:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Doc... and it's not even an article... it reads like a resume.--Isotope23 21:37, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. [1]. [2] [3] [4] Just because he's mostly written about and quoted in non-English-language media doesn't mean he's not notable. Monicasdude 22:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Clean up and rename or delete - The current name only includes his last name, the article is of poor quality. Would only keep if quality is improved. DrIdiot 23:05, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Monicasdude. Also, article quality, in the presence of presumptive notability, is never a basis for deletion. Adrian Lamo ·· 01:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Definitely notable, and I shouldn't be deleted just because it needs cleanup. That said, it's copied directly from the subject's CV [5] – even though it's mostly just a list of facts, there is some prose in there, and I'm quite worried about it's copyright. ×Meegs 22:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.