Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryli Morgan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --- Deville (Talk) 00:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ryli Morgan

Non-notable "actress-model-singer", I can find no evidence that she has ever acted, modeled or sung for anyone other than her husband or friends' very indie movies. Speedy was removed but this deserves one in my opinion. Dipics 01:10, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete makes some assertions of notability, but I'm not convinced she passes WP:BIO. Also, removing speedy delete tags is not allowed. If it happens in the future, restore the tag and put {{drmspeedy}} on the userpage of whoever did the removing. -Elmer Clark 03:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Wishy-Washy Keep although I feel that this performer may be using Wikipedia to enhance her visibility (it is clear that the article is writing by her and/or her husband/producer), I do find a reasonable number of fanzines and sites that have interviewed her in depth [1] [2]. Any one of these fanzines alone would certainly not account for notability. I am hard-pressed to acknowledge that the mass of fanzines that covers this artist amounts to notability. --dtony 05:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, almost nothing of any real substance.-Kmaguir1 06:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. She is obscure but still relevant to that genre although, the article needs clean-up. NeoFreak 08:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity article written by a single use account. She does seem to be a model (of the skin variety). 167 unique Ghits out of 509, many for modelling agents she is listed with. "Heaven Help Me" ranks in the 43.6kth, "Sin" ranks in the 113kth per Amazon.com, no sign of independent reviews. Strangely enough, there's another short Baranowski film "Roxanna" which is not on her filmography reviewed on DVD Talk, a site ranked with a respectable 3827th per Alexa. I could find none of her other movies on the site. She doesn't cut it as an actress per WP:BIO, and not under WP:PORN BIO either.Ohconfucius 09:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The fact she may be "relevant" to the genre is not part of WP:BIO, or WP:NOT, and is unverified in any case. For that matter, fails WP:V for lacking any reliable documentation outside of her own website and IMDB. Only 167 distinct Ghits out of 508 general hits, and Alexa says her website isn't in the top 100,000. No multiple non-trivial articles by third parties, though there are a few movie fanzines. No evidence her movies have won awards, been a major work, nor has she won any awards or contributed substantially to her field. The article is a resume, and WP is not a free webhost. I'm willing to concede one review of one of her films by Joe Bob Briggs, though considering his interest in her body, I'm uncertain how this would relate to WP:BIOs requirement for '...widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field'... Tychocat 10:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete There is no possible way that this person meets WP:BIO. Total vanity article. Non-notable "actress", non-notable "model", non-notable "assistant director", non-notable "singer". zero+zero+zero+zero still equals a goose egg. I'm sure if she works on the article a bit more she can add "script writer" and "key grip" etc. to her non-notable resume but my answer would still be the same. Beaner1 13:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as above. Crabapplecove 13:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete she is the top one or two on the castlist of most of her movies, that seems pretty notable to me, but none of her movies are on box office mojo, and she barely returns any relevant google results. mathewguiver 13:48, 31 August 2006.
  • Comment Her husband or family friends produced her movies. I suspect this is the reason that she is at the top of the castlists. Dipics 14:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity and nn. (and, as per Beaner1, watch out for future entries under "Best Boy" and "Gaffer"!) Marcus22 14:30, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete My sister has done everything this actress has, and she most certantly does not qualify for an article. Piling up a ton of non-notable attributes does not make one notable. Resolute 01:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete(ish) per WP:BIO Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 02:14, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep this "non-notable" has done just as much as others (Amy Lynn Best, Alaina Capri, for example) who are already listed at Wikipedia. Why single one out for deletion when others have been allowed? Besides, just because you want an article to be deleted doesn't mean you have to be insulting to the "topic" in question.
• Comment While the fact that there are other articles on Wikipedia that shouldn't be listed is never a valid argument to keep an article, I have to agree that Amy Lynn Best shouldn't be listed either. I have added a speedy tag to her article. Alaina Capri was at least in movies produced by Russ Meyer, a notable if not necessarily quality producer. Dipics 18:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.