Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rydens School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rydens School

Delete non-notable school. AlistairMcMillan 23:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete No assertion of notability.--Húsönd 23:52, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Secondary school, ergo notable. -- Necrothesp 02:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I added the Ofsted report as a reference. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps I was wrong to nominate this. After all the school does contain "top notch geezers to have a gass with". AlistairMcMillan 03:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep The nature, scope and size of this secondary school justify retention, particularly with TruthbringerToronto's additions and others on the way. Offending text re "top notch geezers to have a gass with" was removed, which seems to clear up all of the nominator's issues. Alansohn 07:34, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alansohn. bbx 07:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no assertion of notability for this specialist school. Possible speedy under CSDA7 Catchpole 11:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. There is no way that any school should be speedied (or meets the criteria). Even AfDs always provoke controversy. -- Necrothesp 15:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep — Secondary school, and article is not a stub. — RJH (talk) 17:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No assertion of notability and the OFSTED report is not a non-trivial reference. I am unable to find any non-trivial sources on google. JoshuaZ 18:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alansohn.--Vsion 19:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alansohn.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 22:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alansohn. --Myles Long 06:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alansohn. --ForbiddenWord 13:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. No comment needed, the article speaks for itself. Vegaswikian 06:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep rydens is a specialist school and is very famous for its drama, and enterprise work, it should be expanded not deleted. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.3.92.27 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Doesnt assert notability, and probably borderline in regarding to meeting the proposed WP:SCHOOLS guidelines. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 07:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Alansohn, notable as a specialist school and meets proposed WP:SCHOOLS guidelines. PS can someone please fix the comment by VegasWikian, I'm pretty sure he would never !vote keep.  ;-) Silensor 05:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.