Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Shillington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ryan Shillington

Pure vanity. Despite asserting his importance to both companies, neither the Troux website, nor the The BookHauler website mention him among the people significant to the company, tho The Bookhauer site does mention the founder of it as one Ame Shillington, so Ryan is probably a relative. Caerwine Caerwhine 00:12, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BIO. --Metropolitan90 00:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Metropolitan. --RabidMonkeysEatGrass 00:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DVD+ R/W 00:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Not notable. DarthVader 00:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Adambiswanger1 01:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:BIO --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 01:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete My opinion is summed up by a sentence from the article's first edit: "As soon as Mr. Shillington accomplishes something of note, we'll make sure to publish it here."-- The ikiroid  02:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of sufficient importance to be in an encyclopedia. All signs point to vanity posting. Interlingua 03:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, this fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat 03:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. nn, vanity, fails WP:BIO.--Dakota ~ 04:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn, vanity CodeWeasel 04:15, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Comment: Also, looking at the page's history, it looks to me like an IP created this page. How did that happen? Nevermind - created before new rules on page creation by anons. -zappa.jake (talk) 08:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Non-notable. Moreschi 09:18, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Nick C 11:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --Tim1988 ^talk 12:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Xyrael ^T 13:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 00:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity post. TalwinHawkins

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.