Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russsian claims about Warsaw Uprising 1794

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE, as 70% of all votes are for deletion, and POV forks are against Wikipedia policy. JIP | Talk 07:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Russsian claims about Warsaw Uprising 1794

This article is just a copy and paste of the Warsaw Uprising (1794) article. User:Molobo disliked its sourced expansion and tried to blank it. When blanking was reverted he pasted the entire content into the new title creating a duplicate article Irpen 02:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I am a nominator. --Irpen 02:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The author tries to put information from non-objective source as objective article. The source is from Imperial Russia regarding Polish uprising against its occupation. Imperial Russia was known for fabricating and being source of many antipolish fabrications. Because I didn't want to delete this(no blanking) I moved it to a proper article that would deal with claim. This information btw doesn't describe Warsaw Uprising but is simply a example of Russian propaganda aimed against Poles and their attempt to win freedom from Russia --Molobo 02:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per fork. Plus wrong spelling for title of page as is (three s in Russian).--Jersey Devil 03:12, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Work out your differences on the original article, don't create a new one for clarification. Let a user know if you need some mediation. TKE 03:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as an apparent textbook example of a POV fork. --Hyperbole 03:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this is pointless
• Delete per all the others, but at the same time instruct Irpen to try to reach NPOV from time to time. //Halibutt 04:01, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all POV forks against concensus.--MONGO 04:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Warsaw Uprising (1794), then delete (no need for a redirect with such a strange name, I think). POV forks must die.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 05:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Love the spelling. 23skidoo 06:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Molobo's opus, as all his previous efforts has been. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 06:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree with deletion as Halibutt has taken to correcting the article from info coming from Tsarist propaganda book.--Molobo 08:26, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Stab POV fork in face. In case you didn't get it, that meant delete. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 08:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as above. Important details for the main article, pointless fork. ProhibitOnions 10:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete POV fork. --Terence Ong 11:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete POV fork. Don't put the onus on anyone else to merge. If the person who added the details wants them in the main article they should go back to the main article and negotiate with the other contributors to it. Bhoeble 12:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and fantasize about seeing an Uncylopedia AfD with "fork" in the title... Deizio 17:06, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as above, then delete. Ak47K
• Uncertain can I be bribed to vote for one side or the other? Dr. Dan 05:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 19:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge back, POV forks are bad karma. Stifle 23:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.