Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Agree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Kimchi.sg 17:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rose_Agree

Her entry should be deleted because she isn't notable, other than for being a really old lady in porn. She did very few films and won no awards. It's almost a joke for Rose to have a Wiki entry. CJ 08:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. The thing is, a lady born on 1910 being a porn actress in 2006 is notable. Not to my taste, but notable. In fact it creeps me out somewhat. But I don't thing my taste should decide what should be here. I would like to see a better article, but this one seems to make the cut. Fiddle Faddle 08:29, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete What makes her notable is being noted by someone other than grannypervs. If some oddball magazine like Details found it worthwhile to write a story about good Rose she's notable. If not, she only has a couple of films and the yuck factor going for her. ~ trialsanderrors 08:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Would we be having this discussion if it was a 90-year old Formula 1 driver? Age can be notable. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:34, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Age per se is rarely notable. All one has to do is to live long enough :). It is the combination of age and "other element" that makes for notability. In this case the combination of age and the unusual occupation makes her entirely notable. I just don't want to see! Fiddle Faddle 09:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Formula 1 drivers are notable by media attention and selection process regardless of age. Porn actors get neither by default, saggy tits or not. ~ trialsanderrors 16:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Driving a formula one car requires skills not usually found in the elderly. Sex, not so much. -- GWO
• Keep. Oldest prawn star seems noteworthy to me, and I have come across her before (no pun intended). David L Rattigan 09:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. She could easily be the oldest porn actress alive. The mere fact she's this old and still in this business makes her noteworthy. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Trialsanderrors. I'm gonna be sick. --Coredesat 10:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Fiddle Faddle. Distasteful, perhaps, but certainly notable. Tevildo 22:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Eeeewwwww, I mean, Keep, based on the proposed criteria for WP:PORN BIO and notariety. Age in combination with other factors can certainly be a determinative criterion. Agent 86 00:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Agent 86. --Merovingian {T C @} 02:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Age alone can be notable if its over 115. Ms. Agree is notable (even at only 95) for taking part in an occupation usually reserved for much younger women. Eluchil404 05:58, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.