Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodes of rome
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Rodes of rome
Non-encyclopedic entry. Borders on G1/A1 speedy. ERcheck 03:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. One in a series of nearly empty articles created by same author. ERcheck 03:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Part of a BC/AD spree by an editor now blocked for 3RR violations. -- SCZenz 03:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
*Delete per nomination. And isn't that supposed to be 'roads', not 'rodes'? Flyboy Will 04:26, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Now that I've reviewed the mind-boggling contributions history of the creating user, who appeared to have had a compelte AD/CE meltdown, this is definitely Speedy Delete as vandalism. Flyboy Will 04:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: I see what you mean - I'd support agree with that speedy; the user is clearly trying to make a WP:POINT. But a {{db-vandalism}} tag might not give the deleteing admin enough reason to know why it's vandalism without this discussion. Jamie (talk/contribs) 05:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Now that I've reviewed the mind-boggling contributions history of the creating user, who appeared to have had a compelte AD/CE meltdown, this is definitely Speedy Delete as vandalism. Flyboy Will 04:38, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Clearly the article is not of Rhodes scholar quality. :) Jamie (talk/contribs) 04:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as A1 short article with little or no context. I am sure that more can be said about Roman roads than this even if it was correctly spelt. Capitalistroadster 05:39, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, drive-by foolishness by disturbed editor, but unfortunately, not quite a speedy. -GTBacchus(talk) 11:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Capitalroadster. Hit the road, Jack. And don't you come back no more no more no more no more. Durova 15:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- delete as per nomination. Gaius Cornelius 17:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
