Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockajazz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --JoanneB 20:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] rockajazz

Neologism. Searching the web for this term results in three hits. One is Wikipedia, one is on one of the artist's web pages. Mikeblas 01:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Also OR. Tychocat 01:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO, only 17 Google results [1]--TBCTaLk?!? 03:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable neologism, fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. OMEN 04:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Danny Lilithborne 08:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom with tremendous gusto. W guice 12:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, NNN. PJM 12:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete same reason as everyone above. ALSO, note that the Talk:Rockajazz page is a planted question looking for more info, by the editor who started the whole article! -- RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib Reverts} 04:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.