Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Hughes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:25, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Robin Hughes

Dare I say ... hoax? Nothing checks out, subtle attempt at humour. David | Talk 22:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

• I would dare say the same thing. If there is no sourcing information provided, then delete. Joyous | Talk 23:50, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as nonsense. The "Philip Swan prize for Excellence in Science" garners 0 hits on Google. [1] Hall Monitor 18:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
  • 'Nonsense' is not among the Criteria for speedy deletion. 'Patent nonsense' is, but this isn't it. David | Talk 18:45, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• there would be no match for the philip swan prize as it is a school award at Harrow for pupils who excel in science - Terry Lewis
• There seem to be some malicious forces at work conspiring to blacken Robin's name. Wikipedia is not as squeaky-clean as you may have been lead to believe.... Dr Simon 'the light refreshment' McKeown
• Delete as an obvious hoax. Fairly funny, though. Frekja 23:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. We need look only as far as the anon comments above for confirmation of its invalidity. --WAvegetarian 15:58, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - The addition of Robin Hughes to articles as diverse as Plato and Apollo 13 does suggest this to be a little bit of a hoax, yes... Shimgray | talk | 15:57, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
• Do Not Delete you cranks.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.