Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Saulnier

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August ☎ 23:28, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Saulnier

This seems to be a vanity article for Mr Saulnier's legal fight with the town of Londonderry, NH. He/a supporter has also modified the town's website to reflect his opinion on the fight. Only link on the Robert Saulnier page is to a website supporting his fight, which appears to be run by him. Nothing against the man or his fight, but it does not seem noteworthy! Isoxyl 20:26, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, nn. (Also, I've added the missing header to this VfD subpage.) — mendel ☎ 20:44, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable. Amren ^(talk) 20:50, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. Dottore So 00:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nominator clearly has characterized this one correctly.---CH (talk) 06:53, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, there have been numerous articles about Saulnier in newspapers including: "The Londonderry Times," "The Union Leader," "The Eagle-Tribune." His case has been recieving notice... no reason to not keep it here.
• Delete, just as I am the original nominator, please note that the one keep vote came from the person who created the page in question. Isoxyl 13:00, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Yes, I created the page... but I believe it is a useful addition to Wikipedia. What is the point of Wikipedia if anything "controversial" is removed? If anyone thinks it is an article in support of him and/or slanted, then you can feel free to edit it and improve it. Personally, I think this guy is a nut and should have been evicted... but I wrote the article based on the facts and press stories.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.