Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Rosenbergs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Rosenbergs

Possible hoax or nn vanity. No sources given to assert notability. Unverifiable, Google gives 21 links for "Robert Rosenbergs", none of which verifies the existance of this person. Was tagged for notability and sources, but they were removed. Prod notice also removed. Ezeu 00:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: per nom. --Hetar 00:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable. The only solid fact in the article is the claim the guy is in the Ranger Hall of Fame - I can find no evidence of that through Google or Lycos searching. Without that supposed claim, subject is non-notable. Repeated removal of tags makes me suspect hoax or vanity as well. Johntex\^talk 00:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn, many other people reach rank of captain.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:57, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:V and WP:BIO, and possibly WP:HOAX and WP:VANITY --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:43, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn-bio, probaly hoax and vanity. --Terence Ong 10:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, non-verifiable. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, Johntex Deizio 00:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete,non-notable, and per above. Vulcanstar6 00:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.