Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Hoyt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Hoyt

Two non-notable bios in one article. Delete unless notability information comes to light. GTBacchus^(talk) 16:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination (WP:BIO x2) Politepunk 17:48, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete ... and twice {{nn-bio}}, so tagged. Sandstein 21:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep as to the first Robert Hoyt, who appears quite well-known and well-published in the space technology community, see [1] for examples of his work, [2] for evidence he is viewed as notable in the field. Monicasdude 21:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as stub with no content. If someone wants to write an article about the space tethers Robert Hoyt that actually has some content in it and assert notability about him, then fine, but this isn't it. Considered as a stub, it lacks sufficient content to be kept. It is standard to delete stubs that have almost no facts in them about the subject. They should be created when there is more content. And finally, this isn't an article OR a stub in its current form. It's a disambig page for 2 articles which don't exist. Slowmover 22:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: Should have been speedied under CSD A7. Thanks. --Ragib 22:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Arbusto 07:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Harro5 01:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.