Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Heinich, Michael Molenda, James Russell

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 11:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Heinich, Michael Molenda, James Russell

Vanity and non-encyclopedic Gorrister 19:01, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

• It appears that Robert Heinich, Michael Molenda and James Russell are the authors of a book Instructional media and the new technologies of instruction. Now Russell does not seem to be the James Russell on whom we have article. Each however are professors at decent univerities, and probably deserve their own pages written by someone knowledgeable about their work. It appears that a page on three of them was written by a clueless newbie. And it isn't vanity. So I think it's best to split them and then create a redirect to James Russell (the chap mentioned above, not t'other one), a dab page less preferably, since he constitutes the bulk of the article. Dunc|☺ 20:16, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; not more notable than the average college professor, even if split into three separate articles (which would thus be 1/3rd as notable?) Sdedeo 20:28, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.