Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Glasscock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Glasscock

NN bio, no edits in six months; no non-Wiki google hits in top ten -- FRCP11 06:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete psychiccruft.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 07:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 09:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Try this Google search [1]: it's slightly more refined. He's clearly notable as a pioneer of the computerisation of astrology. Vizjim 14:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. --Tone 15:54, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. The above search posted by Vizjim is precisely why this article should be deleted: there are very few web resources on this person, as 27 Google hits (with the first one being WP, no less) is basically equivalent to nothing. -- Kicking222 15:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, article fails to establish notability. User:Zoe|^(talk) 20:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. --Eivind^t@c 00:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.