Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riot Siren
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleted. Consensus was overwhelmingly clear, so at the risk of being trout-slapped, I'm closing this before 5 days are up. Friday (talk) 18:38, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Riot Siren
High school band that has yet to record anything and may be on the verge of breaking up. We really need a speedy criterion for articles like this. Delete posthaste. --howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 00:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete come on; nonsense or vanity has to apply to this. ♥♥purplefeltangel♥♥ 00:48, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- SPEEDY DELETE Per nom Stu 00:49, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Flapdragon 01:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. No notability established. -- Necrothesp 02:03, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom jnothman talk 02:04, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Borderline A1. --JJay 02:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn -- NSLE (Communicate!) <Contribs> 05:46, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete With fire! Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:47, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Close the Afd as a clear consensus for deletion. I see no need to delay for 5 days in obvious cases. Friday (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Non-notable band. Yay! --Optichan 18:32, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- I improperly speedied this, though it should still be 'deleted as quickly as possible. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 20:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 21:34, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete minor vanity. Kingfox 22:08, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete A1, A7, G1. Vanity. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 23:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete only because a band whot hasn't practiced together inn't really a band, now, is it? It's just a bit o' nonsense. (Vanity has nothing to do with it, there's nothing to be vain of here.) Unfocused 17:07, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.