Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riohcat Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  01:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Riohcat Music

Page was initially set for {{db}} speedy for advertising, then retagged as a {{prod}} with no reason or justification. Thus, I'm bringing it here. advertising. Most pages on Google search are either mirrors of sales pages or this article. み使い Mitsukai 19:30, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as advert. [1]. PJM 21:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Note: relisted 08/03/06. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:59, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as advert of nn company. Makemi 04:36, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable company, musical equivalent of a vanity press, with only two artists (i.e., the founders). Official page... --Kinu ^t/_c 05:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable corporation. — Adrian Lamo ·· 07:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn company. --Terence Ong 10:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.