Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right-socialism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep — the vote fell 3:2 delete. However, this does not seem to match the criterion of WP:OR, and those who voted keep raised valid points against deletion. --Gareth Hughes 20:05, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Right-socialism
nom&vote delete. I may be totally off-base on this one, but looks like a bunch of original research to my eye. At best, this is a woefully inadequate encylopedia article in need of serious attention. Any experts in the audience please comment. Gaff talk 10:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep looks like a woeful article to me, i've heard the term mentioned before, even if this particular article started out as OR it can be improved. ALKIVAR™
10:18, 15 October 2005 (UTC) - Delete: the term gets very few original Google results past the first page, except for irrelevant ones, like "right, socialism" or "right. Socialism". Also, there are no matches on Google News. It's probably a very non-notable neologism and/or original research. I'd reconsider if someone can find a few instances of mainstream usage or a scholarly paper on it. -- Kjkolb 14:25, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete OR --Rogerd 09:28, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Stub created because needed to illuminate Japanese militarism articles. If there is a more standard scholarly description of this aspect of fascism, let's move the page. There are Google hits for "right-socialism", "right-socialist" showing this is not a neologism. (Nominator has been a WPdian for all of a week, BTW, and already has one of those sillier barnstars ... and they wonder why AfD has a lousy rep. A stub is a stub, and WP is founded on them.) Charles Matthews 09:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
