Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhobite/SamuraiClinton articles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep: obviously erroneous nomination of a user page. 02:37, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] User:Rhobite/SamuraiClinton articles

What an out-of-date article about a mere list of mostly redlinks.

• Delete as referenceless listcruft. --SuperDude 01:56, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Doesn't belong on articles for deletion, anything but main namespace goes on WP:MfD. But there's no reason to delete this, if Rhobite wants it gone he can delete it and if he doesn't he can keep it. It's his user space and I don't see how this is disruptive. --fvw* 01:59, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• keep. It is a user space page and not subject to VfD even by superdudes without asking the owner politely first why the heck he keeps this. mikka (t) 02:02, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Don't delete user pages. --CastAStone 02:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I haven't even looked at the article and don't need to. Why are you nominating a User page at AfD? -Greg Asche (talk) 02:21, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment from author: SuperDude, I wish you would have asked me to remove this instead of nominating it for AfD. I don't think it's necessary to track your edits any more, so I'll nominate this page for speedy deletion myself. Rhobite 17:05, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.