The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as lacking even the tiniest shred of evidence of meeting any realistic inclusion guideline. Guy 12:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Self-referential, trying to promote new project created in the last 1-2 days. Not notable yet. Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 09:37, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --Huon 10:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete and add back when they don't fail spectacularly. :) -Trevyn 12:20, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.