Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Queen Hypothesis - non-Darwinian view

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Proto||type 12:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Red Queen Hypothesis - non-Darwinian view

POV, original research. Also unformatted and unwikified, although that can be fixed. Considered a merge with Red Queen but couldn't find any useful material. --Canley 11:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC) Canley 11:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Red Queen & blank text.  (aeropagitica)  12:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per aeropagitica. PJM 13:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this uncited idiosyncratic original research. Create a redirect if anyone thinks it's a likely search term (I don't). Article is an orphan. Aeropagitica, please clarify - when you say blank the text do you mean blank it and leave the history, or do you mean delete the history as well? Just zis Guy you know? 16:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Clarification Text and history deleted together, only a redirect is required. Strengths and weaknesses of the Red Queen Hypothesis can be demonstrated on the original article page. Apologies for the unintended ambiguity.  (aeropagitica)  17:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Its not the sort of title to require a redirect. JeffBurdges 16:45, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, OR.--Tone 21:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete oroginal research ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 00:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no redirect necessary for such an obscure titling. Maybe mention the "controversy" in the Red Queen article if there seems to be a real controversy (i.e. not just some deluded scientist posting their theory here.) —Cuiviénen, Friday, 7 April 2006 @ 02:18 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Red Queen. Seano1 02:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.