Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recognized operating agency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 21:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Recognized operating agency

Anyone who understands this has the jump on me. Delete. BlueValour 23:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. No assertion of significance or future possibility thereof. Bureaucratic term that sd go on Wiktionary if anywhere. Pan Dan 23:59, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - a {{prod}} would have done here: nobody has been near it since January 2004 except for housekeeping, so unlikely to be controversial. Yomangani^talk 00:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - OK - fair comment. BlueValour 00:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. I understand it. Oversimplifying a bit, the term means "telephone company". I added a {{dicdef}} tag. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:12, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• See Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Federal Standard 1037C clean up and Wikipedia:Federal Standard 1037C terms. Uncle G 12:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Peta 05:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.