Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Okasha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rami_Okasha

Appear to be an entirely non-notable person. Certainly not encyclodedia material. Most of what is written is unverified as well Jefffire 07:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. MER-C 08:17, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete come back if he wins the election. It is tempting to keep articles like this on a 'what's the harm' reasoning. However, we have too many lesser known biographies, they are badly partolled and often a target of libels and other damaging crap. --Doc 09:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - not at present notable. Banff and Buchan is solid Scot Nat and was not even remotely winnable for Labour in 2005. Aberdeen South is Lib Dem and doesn't look much more hopeful. As for the rest of the article, so what? BTLizard 10:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable in the Wiki sense. Springnuts 14:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.