Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROM (MUD)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. The votes are: 2 to delete, 1 to keep (discounting keep vote by anon. -- BD2412 ^talk 23:29, July 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] ROM (MUD)

Not notable. -- BMIComp (talk) 5 July 2005 21:45 (UTC)

• ?: Linked page does not exist. --Alex12 3 6 July 2005 00:40 (UTC)
• Page was misspelled on VFD. I fixed it. No vote. --FCYTravis 6 July 2005 06:48 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. DikuMUD is encyclopedic, as are CircleMud and some other major derivates, but just about any mud had it's own slight variation on the code. Radiant_>|< July 6, 2005 13:58 (UTC)
• Keep. ROM is a major deriv, and is the most widely used codebase today. It is also very different codewise from it's predecessors. Far from not notable. 68.102.56.55 20:32, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, seems to be a popular derivative, I looked at mudmagic's game list sorted by codebase at http://www.mudmagic.com/listings/codebase/ and it seems to be the most popular category, doubling the runner-up. Looking on The MUD Connector finds a few hundred MUDs using ROM too. Atari2600tim 08:10, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
  • However, I think the authors listed in the article shouldn't be wikilinks when there's nothing else notable about them. It needs some minor modification, but not deleted. Atari2600tim 08:14, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.