Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quibbly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Canderson7 ^(talk) 18:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quibbly

Neologism, yet more barse and taint stuff. No relevant Google hits on either the term or its alleged originator. Tonywalton  | Talk 14:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary.--Adam ^(talk) 14:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete What is with these "Wikipedia is not..." quotations. Wikipedia is not a democracy :-) εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 14:52, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, obviously. Neologism used by a web forum member. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete/wangi 15:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete article admits the word was created to replace "Taint" which was AfD'd. Ruby 15:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Sockpuppets are out tonight. Ashibaka tock 17:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the quibbley, and don't delete my vote again, fuckers! EdHalstram 17:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment the articulate Mr Halstram has taken to repeatedly removing the afd tag from the article, blanking this afd page and vandalising talk pages. And what on earth is a "cockmonkey"? Apparently I am one. Tonywalton  | Talk 17:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Please don't blank this page or otherwise modify other users' comments. Anyone tampering with this page may be blocked from editing temporarily. · Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 17:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as nonsense. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 17:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverified nonsense. The links on the page do not contain any mention of this term, as far as I can tell. --Thunk 22:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.