Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qadiani Problem (book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Eluchil404 16:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Qadiani Problem (book)

• Speedy DeleteThe points have been discussed repeatedly, the links can be placed on the author's page. and theres not enough unfo to warrant this article's own page. --AeomMai 19:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • This does not appear to meet any speedy criteria. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. WorldCat shows dozens of libraries with copies of this book, and it has an LCCN. It's clearly notable. I agree with you that the page should be expanded. --Sneftel 20:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I think Qadianism aka Ahmadi related articles should also be possible candidate for deletion.

Siddiqui 03:22, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, seems worthy of its own article, and none of the nom's reasons for deletion are really reasons for deletion anyway. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into author's article. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment the reason i elected this article is that it is too short, and cannot be expanded much further. The whole book has been explained in a few sentences, Though, in retrospect, a merge would be good too.--AeomMai 21:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

If those few sentences completely explain the book, it must be a very short book indeed. :-) If you want ideas on how to expand it, check out the WP articles on other "opinion" books. --Sneftel 02:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

This is nothing but Qadiani/Ahamdi agenda to remove Muslim related bools that critically discuss their religion. There are also Qadiani related article that are short that will also canbe put on deletion. This is totally unaccepable. The article is a stub and will be unacceptable. Siddiqui 10:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Tell me theses articles and i'll personally put them up for deletion.--AeomMai 18:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

You also have this notion that there is some strange "Qadiani Conspiracy" going on to turn everything against "mainstream" muslim belief. Keep your beliefs out of this neutral zone.--AeomMai 19:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep No reason to delete. BhaiSaab ^talk 19:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.