Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purity Distilling Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Purity Distilling Company

NN other than what's mentioned, and that's already in the Boston Molasses Flood article. If not a delete, at least a redirect is in order, IMO. Jemiller226 03:18, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete : I know little about Boston Molasses Flood, the page contains hardly any information. A redirect could do. Manik Raina 05:01, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep The article is way too short, but the topic is noteworthy enough for an article. I think that it's better to fix it than delete it. --Apyule 05:05, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Conservare_(?) as per Apyule. --Merovingian (t) (c) 06:21, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as per nominator. Proto t c 11:37, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Apyule. ral315 16:12, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, can be expanded. feydey 21:34, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Boston molasses disaster (that's the target of the redirect at Boston Molasses Flood). If we ever acquire significantly more information about this particular company then it can be broken back out. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 22:58, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand as per Apyule. Eldereft 23:33, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep company is notable enough to be worth at least a stub, and that's what we have here. If someone searches on "purity distilling company" at least they'll learn the organization's primary notoriety. Collabi 08:15, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per TenOfAllTrades. BrainyBroad 11:29, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect as per TenOfAllTrades. Pilatus 15:07, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand as per Apyule. Aecis 15:54, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.