Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pukehou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. - Bobet 22:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pukehou

Delete: Blatant advertising with no encyclopaedic value. If someone would like to add some pertinent detail I'll happily remove the delete tag. Nickj69 12:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, it's a real place. The article needs wikification, but I don't see any particular advertising in it. JIP | Talk 12:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, it doesn't look like an ad to me. --Terence Ong 12:40, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete does look like an ad to me for the only shop in town. Puke Who? Defunkier 14:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the place may be real but this isn't an article about it, it's an advert. If it becomes an article about the place I'll change my vote. — ciphergoth 17:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I rewrote the article. Not brilliantly, but its a start, and the place does exist. Jcuk 22:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I've added a bit more to Jcuk's fine start. Grutness...wha? 23:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Stub and category added to article; it appears to be perfectly legitimate in form and content.  (aeropagitica)  23:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Looks fine now. --Martyman-(talk) 23:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Update Change my vote to keep - Good work done by Jcuk, Grutness and aerpagitica - I'll remove the delete tag. --Nickj69 08:02, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.