Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychotectic therapy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 00:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Psychotectic therapy

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information, and I believe that this could adequately be merged into a separate article, such as, for example, Treknobabble. — Mike •  16:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fictional therapies only mentioned in one episode of a television series. How about aversion therapy for people who create articles like this? Seriously, Memory Alpha was created for cruft like this. - Motor (talk) 17:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as proposal. michaelCurtis ^talk+_{contributions} 18:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete concur with Motor, why are these people not at Memory Alhpa? KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GassyGuy 21:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to the episode; suggest to Memory Alpha. (I think the cruftiness above shows bad faith, even though I don't think the article should be here, either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Arthur Rubin (talk • contribs) .
  • Sorry about that, it was me. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Motor; a stubby, unexpandable, fancrufty dicdef. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not really anything worth merging or sending to Memory Alpha, IMHO. Eluchil404 05:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Motor. Thatcher131 21:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.