Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Providence Place Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Providence Place. howcheng {chat} 22:29, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Providence Place Mall

Delete - per nomination. Does not appear to be a notable location. D.valued 15:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep large, well-known shopping malls. This article, which looks to be in fine shape, is about a mall which seems perfectly "notable" with 50,600 Google hits [1] and 35 recent news media mentions [2]. --W.marsh 15:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Whoa, on closer inspection, this is about the same building as Providence Place. Merger is needed, adding the appropriate tag. --W.marsh 15:39, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
    • There, I've performed a quick merge. --W.marsh 15:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Just to clarify, redirecting to Providence Place is what I think should be done now. Providence Place Mall is a plausible search term. --W.marsh 21:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep or merge as per W.marsh Jcuk 17:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep well known malls as they serve thosands of people.Gateman1997 17:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Gamaliel 19:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep easily important enough. Calsicol 19:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Providence Place. (The merge was completed already). All malls of this size are probably notable, but this one was also the centerpiece of a dramatic urban renew project in the 1990s. ×Meegs 21:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• keep please this is well known and has received media attention erasing it does not make sense at all Yuckfoo 21:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Providence Place. Capitalistroadster 23:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Providence Place; not sure which way it should go. This is a major development in downtown Providence. --SPUI (talk) 00:53, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • The banner on the top of their web site, providenceplace.com, indicates that Providence Place is the proper name. ×Meegs 01:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and/or redirect as above. Radiant_>|< 01:18, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Very important. -- JJay 03:00, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Providence Place as merge completed. -- JLaTondre 21:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.