Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proto Man: Powered Up

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proto Man: Powered Up

Prediction of future editions of a video game, delete per WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball --Hansnesse 00:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as Wikipedia is not notable. —This user has left wikipedia 01:13 2006-02-02
• Delete as per nom. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 01:48, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. C'mon, 2013? It doesn't take seven years to create a game. Royboycrashfan 05:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. ??? and per nom. Akerensky99 05:23, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete obviously fancruft. Savidan 07:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: hoax. No Googles, and there'd be news somewhere on the Internet if this was real (I had no idea people still like Mega Man that much, but they do!). Marblespire 08:30, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

"I had no idea people still like Mega Man that much, but they do!" What nonsense is this..? -Zero^Talk 20:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as hoax. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 11:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete- What is this doing in an encycolpedia.? -Zero^Talk 20:06, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Bad ideas 20:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, huh? wha?, doesn't appear salvageable. ←Hob 21:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fancruft. --AlexWCovington (talk) 23:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Reluctant delete, despite inherent awesomeness of name. Proto||type 15:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - joke. --Latinus (talk (el:)) 17:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per crystal ball. --Kinu 08:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unreferenced speculation ikh (talk) 02:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.