Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prof K E Viswanathan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prof K E Viswanathan

Fails WP:V (probably there is an issue of Conflict of Interest too)  Doctor Bruno  02:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please explain why this fails WP:V -- Librarianofages 02:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

No sources have been given  Doctor Bruno  02:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment Have you tried to verify the information yourself? -- Librarianofages 03:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Article and more Articles [1] Doctor Bruno 

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. --  Doctor Bruno  03:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Fails WP:V and a violation of WP:SOAP. Appears to be a vanity page created by subject of article - violation of WP:VAIN and WP:AUTO. Professor's name gives no relevant hits outside wikipedia mirrors. Key term, "democrism", yields almost no ghits outside of wikipedia mirrors. No relevant hits in google books or google scholar. Bwithh 03:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please avoid the term Vanity. We can better use Conflict of Interest for that Doctor Bruno 

• Delete Allow me to expand the above statement. A search shows no relevent hits. Thus, it is impossible to verify this article and fails WP:VERIFY completely. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 03:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Less results using "-wikipedia" flag: [2]. utcursch | talk 05:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per sivaBakaman _Bakatalk 04:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:PROF. Also WP:AUTO. utcursch | talk 05:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I prodded this article on 17th Oct, when my googling failed to verify existence of the man, his books or organisation. No new evidence since. Mereda 06:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Soapbox article. BusterD 11:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no verifiablity, possible COI, soapbox.-- danntm ^T _C 15:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete as per above. It's a badly written, unsourced, unverifiable article with a clear conflict of interest. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 20:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No links for "International Socio-Economic Economic Research Bureau". ~ trialsanderrors 22:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- Badly written article. No sufficient links or source provided to check his notability. Nileena joseph 02:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- so...much...bold...can't...concentrate. Oy. NielsenGW 04:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.