Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro Per Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete  (aeropagitica)  16:41, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pro Per Inc.

The article has no context as to why the person or organization merits being in an encyclopedia, makes vague references to a Supreme Court case without telling all and sundry what it it about, and is an ad for both the subject's activist legal services and a documentary about same, and has major POV problems. Pat Payne 15:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - advertisement. -- P199 16:30, 31 (UTC)
• Delete -as stated above, this is an advert or proto-vanity page. Ande B 04:34, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advert/vanity/no context. Stifle 20:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Page is POV, and advertisement and likely a vanity page as well. Glowimperial 20:58, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment The KOLENDER v. LAWSON case and it's implications sound like it might be notable, but this article have the "wrong" focus. It should have been about the case (under a different title), not the guys "law firm". --Sherool (talk) 23:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep but NPOV, cite and general cleanup. I see no notability issue. --{{subst:user|4836.03}} 06:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.