Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Albert alternative education programs

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep or merge. There is no consensus for deletion, and I am not quite sure as to how to merge this into two different articles. (What type of redirect should be left behind?) Therefore I will just keep the article as it is right now, and if anyone figures out how to merge this, they can go ahead and do it. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:47, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Prince Albert alternative education programs

• Too narrow, too poorly written, basically meaningless 83.67.53.107 18:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't seem notable. Probably no different from programs at hundreds of schools.
• Delete -- or merge somewhere if a suitable article is found. - Longhair | Talk 23:41, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete drini ☎ 23:42, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, joint program by two different school divisions. Kappa 23:44, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• keep' please kappa is right Yuckfoo 01:31, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to both Saskatchewan Rivers School Division and Prince Albert Catholic School Division. I can verify the info from http://www.pacsd6.sk.ca/sped.html but cannot currently find any possibility for expansion. I believe readers will be better served by keeping these programmes with the district articles. Once expanded, each of these programmes can be split out to their own article. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:36, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment as per Wikipedia:Guide to Votes for deletion, a merge vote means: "Keep and merge the content into Example, leaving a redirect afterwards". And there is no way of leaving a redirect to two different articles. So I guess we have to choose one of them.-Poli (talk • contribs) 05:45, 2005 August 4 (UTC)
    • How about leaving a dab there pointing to the two districts that share these programmes? DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:53, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as User:DoubleBlue or keep. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 06:28, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
  • On reflection I've decided to give it a chance because it makes perfect sense on its own and saves duplication in the other articles. My voting first preference has changed. Keep, or failing that merge as User:DoubleBlue. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 12:03, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with the appropriate school districts. --Carnildo 08:08, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as User:DoubleBlue Salsb 16:42, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as per DoubleBlue •Zhatt• 23:31, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable. Gateman1997 23:45, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as User:DoubleBlue -- Spinboy 01:00, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.